Some 280 school-leavers from Surrey, which contains some of the country’s most affluent addresses, got into the two universities in a single year – as many as the combined total from almost a third of England’s local authorities. Figures also show that 11 areas failed to send a single student to Oxford or Cambridge, despite repeated attempts to widen access to elite institutions. The figures underline the extent to which children’s chances of a decent education remain stubbornly linked to postcode and family background after 13 years of Labour. Last night, the Conservatives warned that thousands of young people had virtually no chance of getting into top universities because of a failure to tackle “social mobility black spots”. It follows the publication of figures showing that privately-educated pupils are almost seven times as likely to get into Oxbridge as those from state comprehensives. Damian Hinds, a Tory member of the Commons education select committee, who obtained the latest data in a Parliamentary question, said it underlined the “shocking truth of educational inequality under Labour”. “Despite promising the earth and spending billions of pounds more on schools, by the time they left office leafy Surrey produced more Oxbridge entrants than 47 poor local authorities combined,” he said. “In the 21st Century it is a disgrace that young people’s futures are so determined by where they happen to grow up.” Figures published by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills show the number of children from each of England’s 150 local authorities admitted to Oxbridge and the 20 leading Russell Group universities in 2009/10. The councils with the 10 highest numbers of Oxbridge entrants were all in the south-east, topped by Surrey, followed by Oxfordshire with 210, Hampshire with 180, Hertfordshire with 175, Kent with 150, London’s Barnet with 125 and Buckinghamshire with 120. By comparison, no students from 11 councils made it to Oxford or Cambridge – Gateshead, Halton, Hull, Knowsley, Middlesbrough, Plymouth, Redcar and Cleveland, South Tyneside, St Helens, Stoke-on-Trent and Thurrock. The pattern was repeated for entrance to the Russell Group, which also represents universities such as University College London, Imperial College and Edinburgh. Surrey sent 1,930 students to these universities – 63 times more than from Thurrock in Essex. Five local authorities had more Russell Group entrants in 2009 than 61 others combined. The disclosure follows a series of fierce Government attacks on leading universities for failing to create a more socially-balanced student body. Earlier this year, Nick Clegg accused Oxford and Cambridge of being effectively biased against poor pupils, saying they had to ensure “British society is better reflected” in their admissions to justify state funding. But universities have defended their record, saying that the number of deprived students has increased in recent years. The Russell Group has also repeatedly blamed the schools system for failing to encourage enough students from poor backgrounds to apply.
GMT 16:03 2018 Tuesday ,23 October
Crimean Kerch Polytechnic college reopens after attackGMT 17:15 2018 Thursday ,06 September
University of Tyumen to host Siberian legal forumGMT 03:44 2017 Thursday ,28 December
AUS signs agreement with Zulekha HospitalGMT 08:30 2017 Tuesday ,26 December
Ukrainian university includes Urdu language in curriculumGMT 18:58 2017 Monday ,25 December
AUS on way to becoming leading research university in the regionGMT 07:26 2017 Sunday ,24 December
UK students lagging behind in international testsGMT 00:49 2017 Thursday ,21 December
Alba CEO addresses Susquehanna University studentsGMT 23:27 2017 Sunday ,17 December
Musical performance by children of determination at Canadian UniversityMaintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor