A US federal court has declined to put an emergency halt to President Donald Trump's revised travel ban, saying lawyers from states opposed to the measure needed to file more extensive court papers.
States led by Washington and Minnesota challenged Trump's original executive order, issued in January, which sought to restrict travel from seven countries and stop refugees from entering the US.
Seattle US District Court Judge James Robart issued a temporary restraining order against the first policy last month, and when Trump issued a narrower version of the ban on Monday, listing only six countries, opponents sought to halt its implementation as well.
But Robart declined to apply his first order to the new ban, saying that opponents had to file an amended complaint directly challenging the new ban.
Trump's revised ban blocks new visas for people from six countries including Somalia, Iran, Syria, Sudan, Libya and Yemen. It also temporarily shuts down the US refugee program. Unlike the original order, the new one says current visa holders will not be affected.
Source : QNA
GMT 13:52 2018 Wednesday ,10 October
Kremlin does not prepare amendments to ConstitutionGMT 10:28 2017 Tuesday ,04 April
Brazil court to rule on whether presidential election validGMT 10:25 2017 Tuesday ,04 April
Brazil court to rule on whether presidential election validGMT 16:05 2017 Saturday ,01 April
Venezuelan President Vows to Solve Row between Supreme Court and CongressGMT 16:02 2017 Saturday ,01 April
Venezuelan President Vows to Solve Row between Supreme Court and CongressMaintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor