Whitewashing of terrorism debate will harm the US

Within hours of Akayed Ullah, a Bangladeshi immigrant, allegedly detonating a pipe bomb in New York City on Dec. 11, severely injuring himself and wounding four others, a most comprehensive official and media narrative emerged. 
The formulation of the narrative concerning Ullah’s motives, radicalization and assumed hate for the US was so immaculate, one would have thought it took authorities months, not hours to compile such evidence.
However, the exact nature of what truly happened matters little. Not only was Ullah instantly found guilty by the media, in fact all Muslims and immigrants were as well. 
Following each attack of this nature, Muslims in the US mobilize to fend off accusations concerning their faith, their values and their allegiance to the country in which they live. 
But it is not an easy fight to win. When President Donald Trump is tweeting anti-Muslim propaganda and his administration exploits every opportunity to advance anti-immigrant initiatives, the small, beleaguered community of Muslims in the US can do little to stop the rising tide of Islamophobia. 
The media has played a major role in propagating the negative attitudes toward Muslims and Islam, which, in turn, provide much-needed public support for the government to continue with its anti-Muslim measures. 
Compare such attitudes with the way in which mass shootings carried out by white American men is communicated by the government and media alike. 
Although mass killings by white males have proven to be the deadliest in the US, the discussion generated in the media and official discourses are centered mostly on the mental illnesses of white attackers. In other words, there is a consensus that violence perpetrated by members of the white community is not inherent to that community’s race, culture or religion. 
Five years after Adam Lanza killed 20 first graders and six adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, many are still at work trying to analyze the supposed mental illness that drove him to commit such a reprehensible act. 
The fact that Lanza was carrying more than 30 pounds of weapons seemed superfluous. Many pundits and politicians still refuse to engage in a discussion about guns. 
The “mental health” argument is also championed by Trump himself. 
“Mental health is your problem here,” Trump said in a statement in response to a mass shooting by Devin Kelly, a white male who killed more than two dozen people in a Texas church in November. 
Resorting to easy answers when white men kill is now the norm. Killers of other races, skin colors and nationalities, however, get entirely different treatment. 
As soon as the news emerged of Ullah’s alleged bombing in New York, the Trump administration moved with full force to target immigrants. 
The incessant media coverage and stubborn government targeting of Muslims have led to an unprecedented hysteria which, in turn, has led to numerous incidents of Muslims being targeted because of their faith. Many accounts of Muslims being removed from airplanes, often kicking and screaming, are becoming a fact of life in the US. 
When Khairuldeen Makhzoomi was kicked off a Southwest Airlines flight last year for speaking Arabic on the phone, the agent who escorted him reprimanded him for using his mother tongue in public considering “today’s political climate.” 
Anila Daulatzai was also dragged down the aisle of a plane. She was “profiled, abused, interrogated, detained, and subjected to false reporting and the trauma of racist, vitriolic public shaming precisely because she is a woman, a person of color, and a Muslim,” her attorney told the Washington Post. 
While this hysteria plays into the hands of opportunistic US politicians, the facts suggest that violence is hardly a Muslim phenomenon. 
Newsweek reported statistics showing that white men have committed most of the country’s mass killings. Since 1982, the “majority of mass shootings — 54 percent — were committed by white men,” the figures show. 
Stephen Paddock, the white man who massacred 58 people and wounded hundreds more in Las Vegas in October, was only one of an ever-growing list. 
Countless government officials and journalists have fanned out to find out why Paddock would carry out such a heinous act, as if a white man’s violence is a rare event in a country supposedly threatened by blacks, Mexicans and Muslims. 
Yet the truth is that the white man’s profile is the most violent in the US. Research conducted by Eric Madfis from the University of Washington argued in 2014 that, in the US, “middle-class Caucasian heterosexual males in their teenage years and in middle age commit mass murder... in numbers disproportionately high relative to their share of the population.”
He ascribed this finding to “white entitlement” and “heterosexual masculinity,” among other reasons. 
Still, a whole race, gender or religion are not held suspect; a rule that applies to some and excludes others. 
Certainly, anti-Arab and Muslim sentiment in the US has been around for generations, but it has risen sharply in the last two decades. Arabs and Muslims have become an easy scapegoat for all of America’s instabilities and failures.  But demonizing and humiliating brown-skinned men and women is certainly not the way out of the economic, political and foreign policy quagmires which America’s ruling elite has invited upon its country. 
Such unlawful and undemocratic behavior may feed anti-Muslim hysteria a little longer, and give fodder for useless efforts in targeting innocent men and women. But, in the long run, it will do the country much harm, damaging its democratic institutions and contributing to the culture of violence, founded on entitled white men touting guns and killing innocent people.